Dunning–Kruger effect

Despite its popularity, this graph is not an accurate representation of the effect.

Tell me about your mother Psychology

For our next session...

Cognitive biases Mental health Superstition Famed psychologists

Popping into your mind

Reaction formation Herd mentality Dunbar's Number Crockus Choice theory Religious studies ASMR Persecution complex Psychology Today v - t - e

“”I am wiser than this man, for neither of us appears to know anything great and good; but he fancies he knows something, although he knows nothing; whereas I, as I do not know anything, so I do not fancy I do. In this trifling particular, then, I appear to be wiser than he, because I do not fancy I know what I do not know.

—attributed to Socrates, from Plato, Apology

“”To be ignorant of one's ignorance is the malady of the ignorant

—Amos Bronson Alcott

The Dunning-Kruger effect (also known as Mount Stupid or Smug Snake) is named after David Dunning and Justin Kruger for their seminal paper of 1999. In a stroke of irony, the original paper showcasing the effect was intrinsically flawed from an autocorrelation mistake. Using data generated by uniform noise erroneously supported the same result.

The proposed effect would occur where people fail to adequately assess their level of competence — or specifically, their incompetence — at a task and thus consider themselves much more competent than everyone else. This lack of awareness is attributed to their lower level of competence, which robs them of the ability to critically analyse their performance, leading to a significant overestimation of themselves. In simple words: "people who are too ignorant to know how ignorant they are". When people do not recognize their own mental illness, this is known as "anosognosia"; this is common for people with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.

The inverse also applies: the unusually competent people tend to underestimate their ability compared to others; this is known as impostor syndrome.

While noting the autocorrelation mistake, a 2023 paper further argued that the original work of Dunning and Kruger did not show what was claimed, but instead had only shown that people of all competence levels overestimated their competence; Dunning and Kruger's research had used a small and narrow sample size of 45 undergraduate students.

Nonetheless, David Dunning maintains there have been subsequent studies that support the original claims. In particular, there was a 2021 study of 3500 participants performing logic and grammar tests that concluded there was overconfidence among the worst performers. Dunning concludes that the effect appears largely related to psychological conditions; systemic misconceptions about a task exacerbates the outcome.

The effect found in the Dunning-Kruger study can also be explained by regression to the mean. In simple words, someone who is nearly the worst at a given task might overestimate their talent, but can hardly underestimate it. Even a perfectly rational agent's guess will naturally tend to be above reality as long as there is some uncertainty regarding their score. This means that no matter how many times it is successfully replicated, this study design cannot in principle show that describing the "Dunning-Kruger effect" as a psychological phenomenon is justified. Dunning addresses this in a 2011 paper of his, stating that the argument is "relabeling" the effect at best, and not sufficient in explaining the results at its worst. He concludes that there are methods of estimating this dynamic and that accounting for it has negligible impact on the results.

A finding that is more well established is that people across the board tend to overestimate themselves.

The principle is illustrated indirectly by the common saying that "I've learned enough about ________ to know what I don't know." The implication is that someone who hasn't learned much about the subject would have no appreciation for how much there is to learn about it, and so might grossly overestimate their level of understanding. This is considered by many people to be a truism.

The effect

“”One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision.

—Bertrand Russell, The Triumph of Stupidity

The Dunning-Kruger effect is related to illusory superiority, where people tend to overestimate their good points in comparison to others around them, while concurrently underestimating their negative points. The effect has been shown by experiment in several ways, but in this case Dunning and Kruger tested students on a series of criteria such as humour, grammar, and logic, and compared the actual test results with each student's own estimation of their performance.

Those who scored well on these tests were shown, consistently, to underestimate their performance. This can be explained as a form of psychological projection: those who found the tasks easy (and thus scored highly) mistakenly thought that they would also be easy for others. This is similar to the aforementioned "impostor syndrome" — found notably in graduate students and high-achieving women — whereby high achievers fail to recognize their talents as they think that others must be equally good.

Those who scored lowest on the test were found to have "grossly overestimated" their scores, thus displaying what became known as the Dunning-Kruger effect. And what about the underachievers who overestimated their performance? In the words of Dunning and Kruger:

This overestimation occurs, in part, because people who are unskilled in these domains suffer a dual burden: Not only do these people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices, but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it.

The original study was focused specifically on competence, as opposed to intelligence — Dunning and Kruger were more concerned with the empirical, measurable factors of how well a person could perform a task (even "simple" or "stupid" tasks) and that person's perception of how they performed that task, rather than the more nebulous concept of comparative "intelligence" or "education". However, the inspiration for the entire study was a desperately under-educated Pittsburgher who possessed badly flawed reasoning skills (see below). The term is still properly meant to describe a disconnect between perceived and empirical competence, rather than IQ or intelligence.

A little knowledge can be dangerous

A little knowledge of the Dunning-Kruger effect could give you impostor syndrome!^{[citation NOT needed]}

“”It is not in our human nature to imagine that we are wrong.

—Kathryn Schulz

“”Now, think about how much the average person knows about your area of specialty. Not only do they know comparatively little, they likely have no idea how little they know and how much specialized knowledge even exists. Furthermore, most of what they think they know is likely misleading. Now realize that you are as ignorant as the average person is in every other area of knowledge in which you are not expert. The Dunning-Kruger effect is not just about dumb people not realizing how dumb they are. It is about basic human psychology and cognitive biases.

—Steven Novella

The effect can also be summarised by the phrase "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing." A small amount of knowledge can mislead a person into thinking that they're an expert because this small amount of knowledge isn't a well-known fact.

For a potent example, consider former children's TV presenter and "science advocate" Johnny Ball, who in 2009 stunned audiences by denying the existence of climate change. His reasoning was based on the fact that water vapour as a greenhouse gas is much more prevalent, potent, and thus much more powerful than carbon dioxide — and because combustion reactions also produce water, it should be water vapour we're worried about, not carbon dioxide. Sound reasoning to an amateur, but anyone minimally qualified in atmospheric chemistry would tell you that the water isn't a problem because the atmosphere has a way of getting water to the ground — precipitation, that is, rain, snow, or hail. Thus its concentration (for given temperatures and pressures) remains more or less constant globally.

Ball's premise is also used by some critics against the hydrogen economy: because hydrogen vehicles emit water vapour from their exhaust, they are seen to be more damaging to the environment than petrol-driven vehicles. An ill-informed and unsound argument — hydrogen fuel cell vehicles emit approximately the same amount of water per mile as vehicles using gasoline-powered internal combustion engines. The difference is that while water vapour remains in the atmosphere for only a few days or weeks, and hydrogen gas for about two years, carbon dioxide lingers for more than a century.

Origins

Comparison of actual score vs perceived score. A well-calibrated and honest set of predictions is intended to follow a straight line (i.e., prediction of ability matches the outcome). However, even a dataset of uniform noise gives the appearance of overconfidence. Graphed as a proportion of the over-estimate, those in the lowest quartile were seemingly guilty of the most significant over-estimation.

“”The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool.

—Touchstone, in As You Like It by William Shakespeare

Dunning and Kruger properly proved its existence with the 2000 Ig Nobel Prize winning paper "Unskilled and Unaware of It", doubtless at great risk to personal sanity.

They were famously inspired by McArthur Wheeler, a Pittsburgh man who attempted to rob a bank while his face was covered in lemon juice. Wheeler had learned that lemon juice could be used as "invisible ink" (that is, the old childhood experiment of making the juice appear when heated); he therefore got the idea that unheated lemon juice would render his facial features unrecognizable or "invisible".

After he was effortlessly caught (as he made no other attempts to conceal himself during the robberies), he was presented with video surveillance footage of him robbing the banks in question, fully recognizable. At this, he expressed apparently sincere surprise and lack of understanding as to why his plan did not work — he was not competent enough to see the logical gaps in his thinking and plan.

The idea that people who don't know that they don't know ("Dunning-Kruger effect" is so much less confusing than any "know-know" phrase) isn't particularly new. The Bertrand Russell quote is from the mid-1930s, and even earlier, Charles Darwin, in The Descent of Man in 1871, stated "ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." Even back in ancient Greece, Plato's Apology attributed to Socrates the quote at the top, which today is often summed up as, roughly, "the wisest people know that they know nothing."

In his 1996 book Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot, Al Franken described the phenomenon of "pseudo-certainty", which at the time of writing and onwards, was rampantly being displayed by pundits and politicians such as Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich, who would use "common sense" as the basis for their cocky assertions. Franken prefers the term "being a fucking moron."

Some examples

Those who think they know never learn. —from the Tao Te Ching

• Members of Answers in Genesis and CMI
• Theodore Beale (Vox Day), and how!
• Lauren Boebert
• Jack Chick
• Ray Comfort and his washed-up sidekick Kirk Cameron
• Creationists
• Steven Crowder
• Flat Earthers
• Global warming deniers
• Adolf Hitler, particularly as commander of the German military
• Alex Jones
• Charlie Kirk
• Michael Knowles
• Marjorie Taylor Greene
• Matt Walsh
• Candace Owens
• Sarah Palin, don't-cha know!
• Racialists
• Rush Limbaugh
• Jordan Peterson
• Rand Paul
• Ayn Rand
• Gene Ray with his Twitter handle
• Larry Sanger; micromanaging experts on Citizendium in areas he was not qualified for or had knowledge of.
• Andrew Schlafly; the Lenski Affair, where Schlafly decided that he was both intellectually qualified and physically equipped to study bacteria himself.
• Ben Shapiro
• Donald Trump and his supporters, bigly
• Anti-vaxxers
• Conspiracy theorists
• Some engineers
• Anonymous user

See also

• Backfire effect
• Delusions of grandeur
• Groupthink — multiple people feeding each other's delusions
• Igon Value Problem
• Nobel disease
• Open mind
• Overconfidence effect — a major driver of the Dunning-Kruger effect
• Truthiness
• Ultracrepidarianism
• Fractal wrongness — basically the Dunning-Kruger effect taken to extremes

External links

• "The Dunning-Kruger Song", from The Incompetence Opera, presented at the 27^th First Annual Ig Nobel Prize Ceremony.
• What happens when Dunning-Kruger and Poe's Law collide.
• We are all confident idiots.
• One of the problems with a Democracy.
• Why incompetent people think they're amazing – David Dunning | TED-Ed
• John Cleese on stupidity.

References

Articles on Cognitive biases

  Selection bias  -  Outcome bias  -  Confirmation bias  -  Clustering illusion  -  Demonization  -  Hindsight bias  -  Confabulation  -  Framing  -  Just world fallacy  -  Overconfidence effect  -  Walled garden  -  Survivorship bias  -  Frequency illusion  -  Overgeneralization  -  Response bias  -  Experimenter bias  -  Moral licensing  -  Ultimate attribution error  -  Gambler's fallacy  -  Delusion  -  Viés de seleção  -  Conjunction fallacy  -  Outgroup